Deflation is Theft: Simplified for Ron Paul’s Gold Boiler Room

Government declares gold is legal tender for payment of debt and taxes.

Person A and B have 100 ounces of gold each.

Person A spends 100 ounces of gold to buy a warehouse.

Deflation makes the gold worth twice as much and the warehouse worth half as much.

Person A has a net worth of 50 ounces of gold with his warehouse. Person B has a net worth of 100 ounces of gold.

Person B has stolen 50 ounces of gold from Person A with the help of the government making gold to be legal tender.

Why would anyone buy a warehouse and start a business if you get more value from doing nothing and letting the golden legal tender steal a free lunch for you?

Deflation steals value from all real assets and redistributes the value to those holding monetary units. When government makes gold legal tender and legalizes theft through deflation, it is socialism for the idle, lazy, and non-productive rich, specifically Ron Paul and his golden comrades in the gold boiler room.

Read “Commodity Monetarism is a Trick Mechanism of Usury and Coercion” if you want more logic.

Election 2012 Results: Goldman Sachs 98%, Pay Pal 1%, Others 1%

The biggest winner of the 2012 election were the 2/3rd of the American population who decided not to waste their time voting for a Goldman Sachs candidate. It was no surprise that Goldman Sachs would win the election considering that Goldman Sachs owns the media. However, it was surprising that Gary Johnson, the candidate of Peter Thiel’s Feudaltopia, captured over a million votes for 1% of the total vote. In retrospect, I guess it is no surprise since the Goldman Sachs’ candidates were not very attractive.

As you may know, Peter Thiel runs Pay Pal, is an elected member of the Bilderberg steering committee, is a major contributor to Bilderberg, and is a major contributor to right-wing libertarian candidates, who promote the total deregulation of markets, which emulates the classical conservativism of feudalism, where the wealthy are able to dominate land and extract rents from the working class. It also represents the business of usury, where wealthy people are able to dominate the supply of money as interest-bearing credit, the very medium in which we all must use to pay land rents and pay our taxes and what we commonly use to trade the fruits of our toil.

There is no freedom when we’re born in debt with the need to finance our future and rent a limited supply of land from those who already dominate it. We are forced to accept the terms of the wealthy to even legally put our feet on the ground.

While Goldman Sachs was offering a neofeudalism, building bigger bureaucracies for the benefit of big banks, Pay Pal was offering a classical feudalism, breaking big bureaucracies for the benefit of big banks. 99% of the people who voted seem to agree they want the working class to be slaves to the big banks and their corporations. 1% just wants to call their own enslavement to big banks and their corporations as freedom.

Unfortunately, there wasn’t a choice for better government for the benefit of working people and small business. Jill Stein of the Green Party promotes LVT and usury-free greenbacks, but she ruins the good proposals with social eugenics, wanting to tax anything and everything from Mountain Dew to carbon atoms. The geolibertarian cause is not financially supported by the Bilderbergs and foundations funded by robber barons. While the classical feudalists and neofeudalists believe only wealthy people have the right to dominate and own land value, the classical liberals and modern geolibertarians believe all people have the right to own an equal share of land value.

The geolibertarians like the classical liberals want to fully tax undeveloped land value, preventing the monopolization of land unless it used, eliminating land speculation, making land use more efficient, and making the supply of land more available for the working class to afford. Furthermore, the geolibertarians, like the classical liberals, want to end all taxation upon labor and the developed land value, funding government with raw land values.

The geolibertarians, like the hardcore classical liberal Thomas Paine, who rallied the troops to cross the Potomac and defeat the redcoat mercenaries in a surprise attack, want to make sure people are guaranteed their right to an equal share of land value by providing a flat citizen dividend with such collected land rents. The land owners would pay rents to the citizens rather than have citizens pay rents to land owners, which is the opposite of the feudalism and colonialism of classical conservatism and opposite the neofeudalism of modern democratic republics and the neocolonialism of modern banana republics.

The libertarians of Peter Thiel’s Feudaltopia claim they’re against taxation of labor and coercion, but they seem to be fine with a volunteer government which protects the ownership of land by force of those able to purchase it and claim title to it, while forcing the rest of us to pay land rents or enter into agreements of servitude to such individuals.

The geolibertarians want to extend government to end the usury upon the money supply. Geolibertarians believe the legal tender in which taxes and land rents are paid to be a natural public utility. Legal tender is a creature of law, as land ownership itself is a creature of law, and such should remain strictly a creature law, not a state-granted privilege of the wealthy to charge interest.

Monetary origination should reside with the government to benefit the working class and the tax payer rather than benefit the wealthy usurer. The government should not borrow money and put the burden of paying interest upon the tax payer and those who work and give money value. The government should print the money. Monetary origination can fund government, and it has done so in two critical times of American history to fund the American Revolution and the American Civil War.

The libertarians of Peter Thiel’s Feudaltopia want to have a free market in money. I’m just wondering how much interest someone will have to pay to buy or rent land in that free market of money for what is really nothing but an unstable barter system of commodities as interest-bearing credit under their proposed system. In the end, people will be scammed by funny money or commodity crashes, leaving the majority of the people homeless and in servitude to the land speculators, the usurers, and the most wealthy, if they are even extended that opportunity to live and survive upon the land.

Flu Vaccines Now on Sale at Your Favorite Retailer

The marketing campaign is still in full swing with television commercials and posters at retailers trying to sell you flu vaccines. The marketing campaign started with the hysteria of the 2009 swine flu scare.

When the first cases of swine flu were being reported, out of flu season, the World Health Organization of the United Nations, the CDC, the FDA, and the news were warning us that the swine flu was spreading out of Mexico, killing a dozen people, calling it a pandemic. The vaccine makers were rushing to release a vaccine. The normal seasonal flu kills on average 36,000 people per year. Something wasn’t adding up considering the United Nations, government, and news were hyping only a dozen deaths into a pandemic.

What most people don’t realize is the marketing campaign was also suppose to start with an avian bird flu scare. Private contractors messed it up for the drug companies when they found weaponized live avian bird flu in vaccines being shipped by Baxter out of Austria during random product testing.

I read the article where Baxter was trying to ship live weaponized avian bird flu, a month before the swine flu scare. I also read another article that Novartis was caught with a container of swine flu on a wrecked train in Switzerland a week before the swine flu scare. I had the gut feeling that the drug companies were about to launch some bioterrorism on the world. I wrote an article, which I have since deleted when I replaced my old blog with this blog, predicting such would happen.

After the swine flu scare, I read a Bloomberg article that scientists found that the swine flu was engineered in a lab due to genetic markers from swine, avian, and spanish flu. It seems the swine flu was weaponized to kill a lot of people. Fortunately, the engineering failed to meet such objectives.

During this time, I was scared. I predicted a world event. I did not know what was being planned, if it was part of a depopulation agenda or what. It turned out that it was just part of an ambitious marketing strategy to sell flu vaccinations. It is a hard sell during tough economic times, considering flu vaccinations are not effective against all flu strains and considered more risky than the flu by some, especially for healthy people.

These campaigns to sell flu vaccines continue to this day. I had a dream about it last night. I dreamed that police were monitoring Halloween, making sure people were not using Halloween to hide a real dead body in the trunk of their cars. In the dream, I handed the bibliography on the swine flu to a cop checking to make sure a dead zombie was not real. It could have been the real zombie apocalypse if we were all injected with a high dose of mercury or some other weird virus.

On a related note, it is “No Chemtrail Monday” in Georgia. The skies are a deep blue without evidence of a single chemtrail and with cold nights in the forecast. As far as I’m aware, the Atlanta airport is as busy as usual.

Helen Branswell, The Canadian Press, Toronto Sun, “Baxter: Product contained live bird flu virus,” February 27, 2009.
[
http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2009/02/27/8560781.html
* ]

* The original link is now dead. There is a reprint here, among many other locations: [
http://www.infowars.com/baxter-product-contained-live-bird-flu-virus/
].

The Canadian Press, CTV News, “Baxter admits flu product contained live bird flu virus,” February 27, 2009.
[
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090227/Bird_Flu_090227/20090227?hub=Health
]

Sven Egenter and Laura MacInnis, Reuters, Zurich, Reuters UK, “Container of swine virus explodes on Swiss train,” April 28, 2009.
[
http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE53R1PO20090428
]

Jason Gale and Simeon Bennett, Bloomberg, “Swine Flu May Be Human Error; WHO Investigates Claim,” May 13, 2009.
[
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aShZig0Cig4g
]

Jo MacFarlan, Daily Mail, “Swine flu jab link to killer nerve disease: Leaked letter reveals concern of neurologists over 25 deaths in America,” August 15, 2009.
[
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1206807/Swine-flu-jab-link-killer-nerve-disease-Leaked-letter-reveals-concern-neurologists-25-deaths-America.html
]

Lucy Johnston, Daily Express, “Gulf War Toxins in Swine Flu Vaccine,” August 23, 2009.
[
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/122228/Gulf-War-toxins-in-swine-flu-vaccine
]

Dr. Russell Blaylock, NewsMax.com, “Vaccine May Be More Dangerous Than Swine Flu,” July 7, 2009.
[
http://www.newsmax.com/health/vaccine_swine_flu/2009/07/07/232717.html
]

Walt Bogdanich and Eric Koli, New York Times, “2 Paths of Bayer Drug in 80′s: Riskier One Steered Overseas,” May 22, 2003.
[
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/22/business/2-paths-of-bayer-drug-in-80-s-riskier-one-steered-overseas.html
]

Milanda Rout, The Australian, “Vioxx maker Merck and Co drew up doctor hit list,” April 1, 2009.
[
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25272600-2702,00.html
]

London (AP), USA Today, “Polio surge in Nigeria after vaccine virus mutates,” August 14, 2009.
[
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2009-08-14-nigeria-polio_N.htm
]

Helen Branswell, Toronto Sun, “Seasonal flu shots risky: Study,” October 13, 2009.
[
http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2009/09/24/11085521-sun.html
]

Paul Joseph Watson, PrisonPlanet.com, “Obama Science Advisor Called For “Planetary Regime” To Enforce Totalitarian Population Control Measures,” July 11, 2009.
[
http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-science-advisor-called-for-planetary-regime-to-enforce-totalitarian-population-control-measures.html
]

Let us not forget that Secretary of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, was a Bilderberg attendee.

More references can be found here.

Land Owners Are Communists

Give them fish, the landlord will increase the rent. Teach them how to fish, the landlord will charge fees to access the pond.

I was given recent hope in humanity when genius and common sense came in the form of pink hair and with the name of Cinnamon. Cinnamon realized that national debt was a welfare program for the idle rich, as she called Mitt Romney a communist.

Unfortunately, she seemed to miss that Obama works for the same people as Mitt Romney. However, it is still comforting to know she made the connection that rich people were getting richer with the help of the government and at the expense of the working tax payer, and called it what it is, communism, or the state granting privilege to individuals at the expense of others. The Bible calls it usury.

Economists agree we don’t even need national debt. We can pay off the national debt by ending the dishonest and unsound fractional reserve banking system, blamed by economists for the boom/bust cycle, with a sound and honest full reserve banking system. In doing so, the government can simply print the money to pay off bonds as they bring partial bank reserves to full bank reserves as private debt is paid. The savings in interest alone can more than balance the budget. If government needs financing, the government can simply print the money as George Washington did to finance the American Revolution and as Lincoln did to finance the American Civil War.

“It is absurd to say that our country can issue $30,000,000 in bonds and not $30,000,000 in currency. Both are promises to pay; but one promise fattens the usurer, and the other helps the people. If the currency issued by the Government were no good, then the bonds issued would be no good either. It is a terrible situation when the Government, to increase the national wealth, must go into debt and submit to ruinous interest charges at the hands of men who control the fictitious values of gold.” — Thomas Edison

I agree with Cinnamon. Mitt Romney and Barack Obama are both socialist communists who believe in the redistribution of wealth of American labor to idle and non-productive bankers, aristocrats, land speculators, and other usurers around the world.

Not only is the interest collected upon national debt a form of communism, especially when communist China collects interest from American tax payers on a good chunk of the national debt, land ownership itself is a form of communism.

Whoever collects the rent is the de facto State.

Land owners are dictators of the land they own. Land ownership is statism. Landlord is the de facto State of a geographic region. Ownership is dictated by the legal fiction of a larger State or enforced with force of the person or persons claiming ownership of land they found, bought from a swindler, or conquered. They set the rules and collect land rents or collect fees on the use of the land. They may sell it or transfer it to someone else for profit, also known classically as the unearned wealth of rent. Such unearned increments of wealth is value being stolen from those who produce and redistributed to someone who merely holds title.

Neoclassical economists today seem to miss this point. Classical economists believe land is a unique component of production and should have a progressive tax imposed on it rather than labor or real capital. The Old Testament believe that land should not be sold forever, the profit of the earth is for all, and that your toil and real capital is your own. Henry George wrote a book on the subject. One blogger expressed it’s relevance today in a very clear and concise manner, which gave me more hope for humanity: “Georgism and the Single Tax on Land: Why a 130-year-old Idea is Still Relevant Today.”

There is a nice poem about three monkeys and an ape which illustrates this point: “Uncivilized.”

On a completely unrelated note, who knew that the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow was just a metaphor for beer.

Gold Investors Beware: Pakistan, Bankers, London, and Malthus

Old rivals threaten the value of your gold holdings. You should be nervous about the old border dispute between India and Pakistan in the Kashmir region, as even economists have pointed out.

With a strong Western military and intelligence presence around Pakistan, there is the capability of Western intelligence launching a nuclear strike against India, blaming the incident on terrorists or rogue elements of the Pakistan government. If you believe the government orchestrated 9/11 in conjunction with the mainstream media trust covering up the hard evidence, there is no reason why you shouldn’t believe that a staged conflict between India and Pakistan could be the next major world-changing event and crime of the New World Order.

The primary reason for the bankers to orchestrate such an event would be to collapse gold prices. India and China demands 45% of the world’s gold supply. A nuclear strike against India would significantly collapse such demand for gold. The banks could then buy gold at historically low prices, below $300/oz. Think of all the people who bought gold over $800/oz. The banks would want a new world gold standard after buying gold at such cheap prices.

The London rivalry has to do with Ghandi. Ghandi was the pacifist who defeated British imperialism, throwing the British crown, their tea tax, and their colonialism out of India. There has to be some deeply-rooted and hidden animosity within the cold hearts of the monarchs of Europe towards India. The monarchs are still active behind the geopolitical scenes, making appearances or having representation at Bilderberg meetings.

Malthus has to do with the agenda of eugenists and those who believe over-population threatens the planet. According to the World Bank, India has over 1.2 billion people. China, which would be in the direct fallout path of India, has over 1.3 billion people. Another half billion people from Bangladesh to the Phillipines would be affected. World population is a little over 7 billion people. One third to 42% of the world’s population would be directly affected. As Zbigniew Brzezinski has pointed out in a 2009 speech, it is infinitely easier to kill a million people than control them.

Commodity Monetarism is a Trick Mechanism of Usury and Coercion

Nationalize Legal Tender, not Commodities, Credit, or Free Market Currencies

“Gold and money are separate things, you see. Gold is the trick mechanism by which you can control money.” — Thomas Edison, New York Times, December 6, 1921

The view of money as a commodity is screwed up, especially when tied to a rare natural resource whose natural value is already high due to limited supply and high demand, as a store of wealth, jewelry, or technological application, like gold.

You’re mixing a unique and special market for money (means of exchange) whose value should ideally remain constant (supply should increase with increased population, velocity, and other related demand) with a market for a commodity whose value should ideally reflect supply and demand. Having such money as a legal tender for payment of taxes and rent is really messed up since you’re allowing government to intervene in free markets and become a commodity trader.

I’m sure India would not be pleased since the people in India really love their gold jewelry, being the nation with the highest demand for gold, dwarfing the demand from other nations, and would hate for all of it to be sitting in a bank vault so people can use gold certificates to make economic transactions, pay the rent, and pay taxes to the government. People who use cell phones would also pay the increased cost for the government’s decision to use gold as legal tender.

Money as a commodity is a trick mechanism of usurers to steal value, with hypocritical libertarians supporting such theft. Such hypocritical libertarians see everything wrong with inflation but nothing wrong with deflation. They like the idea of stealing a free lunch in their sleep with the help of government increasing the value of their gold as legal tender, at the expense of the productive and other assets. They would rather government fund government with the taxation of toil if they can’t have their delusional fantasy of a government which enforces property rights without the collection of taxes, rather than  increase the money supply to fund government for growing economies and growing populations, to increase monetary velocity to make sure the economy hums with the currency used as a means of exchange rather than an instrument to steal wealth, or to fund public debt without the special interest of individuals seeking low-risk usurious financial interest at the expense of the tax payer.

Paying taxes or rent in gold is a corruption of the free market. It isn’t very libertarian. It is force. It is coercion. It is artificially increasing the value of a commodity and a waste of such a natural resource. It is allowing government to be commodity traders and forces others to be commodity traders as well if they want to live in the nation. Gold as money is Keynesian in the sense that you’re artificially employing people to work hard at finding some yellow rock. In case of nothing to do, break glass, clean up glass, implement gold standard, serve usurious special interests, and look for yellow rocks.

The currency doesn’t have to be backed by anything. If the currency is backed by something, even with full reserves, the currency itself is still usurious financial interest, because in order to use the currency as a medium of exchange, you’re borrowing the asset — you’re borrowing the commodity. You should pay the gold miner or gold owner for the sake of having gold to wear around your neck, to risk and store wealth as a commodity trader, or to make a cell phone. You should not have to pay the gold owner to borrow the gold to pay your taxes. Furthermore, any increase in the value of such a commodity due to increased demand as a means of exchange or other function is allowing the owner or lender of such a medium of exchange to steal value from the borrower, the person with an inventory, the laborer, or the business, who cares only about the money as a medium of exchange and who could care less about the commodity business, the jewelry business, or the technological business of gold.

If you want your currency backed by a commodity, you can always buy the commodity of your choice with your legal tender. You are free to be the commodity trader you want to be to store your wealth, but you should not force others to be commodity traders if you’re the libertarian you say you are and not the socialist you really are, wanting the government to help you steal a free lunch by making your favorite commodity have artificial value.  You also seem to want the tax payer to subsidize the commodity as a privilege and entitlement, to be stored in warehouses and regulated. You also seem to want to use it for purchase and rent of the land, which you also want the government help you claim the land made for all by God as exclusively your own.  You also seem to want to force businesses to accept it as payment for goods and services.

You are free to buy and sell in gold now. You are free to convert your gold now to legal tender to rent and purchase land and pay property taxes to have government enforce your exclusive state-granted title to land. You are free to start a business and accept gold as payment for goods and services. You are free to ask Wal-Mart to accept payment in gold. However, Wal-Mart does not accept gold, and customers don’t want to pay in gold. You complain about the costs of trying to sell your gold for legal tender in the free market.  So like the socialist you are, you whine to the nanny state to coerce others to accept and use gold for payment.

Money doesn’t even have to be backed by debt as credit, including and especially not our current usurious financial Ponzi scheme of fractional reserve banking. Money does not have to be debt or credit. Money can simply be a legal contract provided and regulated by the government, with value given to it because the government accepts and uses the legal contract for their own transactions. Government should not grant special privilege to private bankers and commodity owners to provide the nation’s legal tender.

The value of money can simply be the legal value for payment of taxes and the funding of government and the value of a regulated means of exchange from a representative and transparent government, used voluntarily as a legal contract or means of exchange, which is provided by the legal government. The legal tender should be nothing but a public utility to prevent corruption of free markets in commodities and free market currencies. If such a public utility reduces tax burdens and can pay off the national debt and prevent the usurious special interest of national debt and the sale of interest-bearing treasury bonds, the public utility of legal tender is not only compatible with a libertarian free market, it is also a friend of the libertarian free market.

There is nothing wrong with financial interest if there are non-profit options and if monetary origination doesn’t involve special interest commodity markets where people want to steal value with the origination of the legal tender. Legal tender and money itself is a natural public utility whose supply should be managed to ideally have constant value. It is a legal instrument of exchange. It should not be privatized to allow people to profiteer on such a legal instrument with usury in any illusory form. If there is a need to increase money supply, there is nothing wrong with allowing such origination to fund the government and pay off public debts. If it is done in excess and causes inflation, that is still much better than taxation on labor. Inflation only taxes idle wealth and has no forms, encouraging production and allowing the economy to grow. If you don’t like inflation, you can always buy gold. Taxation on labor increases the costs of labor and harms the domestic economy. Inflation is much better than allowing banks to profiteer on a usurious legal tender and manipulate it’s value to create boom/bust cycles, whether intentional or not.

You do want a free market in credit, as long as the legal tender provided as credit is regulated full reserve credit. You do not want a free market in the issuance of legal tender, since free market legal tender would be a moronic oxymoron.  You want commodities and free market currencies to be the commodities and free market currencies they are, strictly in the free market, without government using them as legal tender. You want legal tender to be the natural public utility it is. Nationalize legal tender, not commodities, credit, or free market currencies.

Talking Points Memo for Money and Land

Land Value Tax: The only tax the Bible supports

Land Value Tax: More jobs per acre

Land Value Tax: The only tax with a fan club

Land Value Tax: The only tax which promotes production and development and reduces the cost of living

Land Value Tax: Better than a property tax

Income Tax: The trade tariff we pay on American labor, sending jobs overseas

Usury: Every major religion condemns it

Fractional Reserve Banking: Ponzi scheme that leads to the boom/bust cycle, compounded interest, and unpayable debt, whereby private banks profiteer on the issuance of the nation’s legal tender and have too much unaccountable power over the economy. This is our current monetary and banking system.

Gold Standard: Artificially increasing the value of gold and looting economies from 50 BC to 1935 AD

Greenback / Continental / Debt-Free Legal Tender: The only sound and honest legal tender, which can prevent the boom/bust cycle, national debt, and the special interest of government wasteful spending. If managed, the origination of such legal tender can also fund government without taxation while the economy grows without causing inflation.

Full Reserve Banking: The only sound and honest banking system. Banks would no longer be able to create and destroy the nation’s legal tender. They would have to provide honest credit and investment services.

Greenback + Full Reserve Banking: The end of national debt and welfare for the rich, freeing up trillions of national debt for better things

National Debt: Welfare for the lazy and idle rich

National Debt: The taxes we pay to give foreign aid to China, other governments, and the unproductive rich

Hypocrite: Libertarians who love free markets and hate government so much that they believe the government should intervene in free markets and become commodity traders by making legal tender backed by gold, artificially increasing the demand and value of their gold holdings

Hypocrite: Libertarians who love free markets and hate government so much that they believe government should enforce the state fiction of privatized land ownership with the coercion of the gun

Campaign finance reform that might work: Ban corporations, especially banks, from lobbying and making political contributions

http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/2012/02/positive-money-pamphlet/

http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/

http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/2012/04/how-does-current-banking-system-affect-you-new-video/

Only economists speak of ending fractional reserve banking because the banks own the television news, magazines, and newspapers.

“It may appear that Positive Money’s proposal for banking reform is somehow too radical or too marginal, since mainstream media are rather silent about it.

But despite the fact that this information rarely makes it into current news, the fact is that many very well-known, important, respected and famous economists were or are calling for a full reserve banking system. Their proposals differ from each other, however the 100% reserve requirements is common to all of them.”

http://www.positivemoney.org.uk/2011/10/economists-supporting-full-reserve-banking/